**“Quantum mechanics”**

We do not confuse Quantum physics (Planck, Einstein) with “quantum
mechanics”. The quantum physics talk about that the photons, are not continuous
waves, but “whatever”, particles, concrete units of energy (nonpelotita it
compacts), of waves that of do not disperse. In opposition to the idea of
Maxwell of continuous waves.

The idea that the waves do not have mass and the particles is compact,
does not have scientific base, but in the prejudice of the classic physics. The
mass has to do with inertia (not with the “substance”), and the one of particle
talks about the certain thing, to the quantum thing (not if he is compact).

The quantum theory (Planck, Einstein) speaks to us of photons like
“particles” (small pieces of wave, Schrödinger), not a “continuous electromagnetic
wave” (Maxwell).

In as much the “quantum mechanics” it is a mathematical speculation, are conclusions of a logical reasoning, that nothing has to do with physics (it does not adjust to the observation), but it is confused the students doing to happen it through the same. With similar names, that dishonestly are used them like interchangeable.

In as much the “quantum mechanics” it is a mathematical speculation, are conclusions of a logical reasoning, that nothing has to do with physics (it does not adjust to the observation), but it is confused the students doing to happen it through the same. With similar names, that dishonestly are used them like interchangeable.

When we compared Einstein with Hawking, it is to compare the “quantum
physics” with the “quantum mechanics”.

Ex Einstein takes a simple example, that can understand an
pre-adolescent, and unmasks an error of the scientists, the box in
acceleration, with a hole in the flank, where sample that a photon falls like a
stone (parabola segment). http://madefi.blogspot.com/

Hawking takes a conceptual error and soon it applies a mathematical
complicated good, and arrives at an absurd one. Ex. The “radiation of Hawking”,
where it takes the gravity like a fluid. One is not to demonstrate
mathematically that it is mistaken, is not an error in the logical method, but
conceptually it is an error. The gravity is not a fluid.

When we compared the quantum mechanics with the alphabet, we could say
that, the “h” is the quarks, the “n” would be the gravitons, the “w” would be
the Boson of Higgs, etc.

It is not worth the pain to
discuss if the “h” sounds or no, or if the “n” is not understood in other
languages, or if the “w” is not of our language. The problem is that
a

**, B, C, are mistaken**.**distortion,**of dishonest personages to whom I call “disguised mathematicians of physicists”. http://madefi.blogspot.com/

**The mechanics not only does not explain,**

**but it confuses**

The idea that the physics is mathematical, is a fantasy imposed by the
mathematicians, the physics is not based on the mathematical one, but on the
physical axioms (the observation), where the mathematical one is a tool to make
the physics logical. The problem that the mathematicians “have won the bank”
and is no form to move them, because they confuse to the indoctos
(politicians), with incomprehensible signs becoming the intelligent ones.

**The logical method, not only does not explain the reason of the physical phenomenon, but it harms the understanding of the phenomenon.**

The mathematical one is a

**description of relations, equalities and proportions**, to this we called

**mechanics**(classic, relativistic, or quantum).

The logic (mathematical)
has axioms. Part of axioms for the logical construction, does not explain the
axioms, the axioms are to begin with inexplicable points. Thus the physics of
the quantum mechanics, leaves from “fundamental forces”, hypothetical
particles, as well as dark energy or dark mass, etc.

The physics
is axiomatic: “On the Theory of relativity and Other Contributions to Science.”
(A. Einstein), 1982, pgs.s 24-27. Where the axioms are the observations, and
these are the destiny of the explanations.

To think that the
explanation of the phenomena is by means of the mechanics, is a concept error.

In the
mechanics, part of an axiom, that is a departure point of the logic, is impossible to give an explanation of an axiom
(logical). To the phenomenon nonexplained, magic is called. Thus the magician,
removes the doves from a handkerchief, phenomenon that we cannot explain
(magic).

The logical
construction (mechanical, mathematical) part of axioms, at no moment explains
the axioms (because the logical axioms cannot be explained, is an axiom, is a
departure point); it is what it has happened with the “quantum mechanics”: To
start off of axioms: Of inexplicable forces (“fundamental”), of dark,
hypothetical concepts, etc.

Reason for which we listened to say: “Nobody knows what is the gravity”. This only valid for the quantum mechanics.

Reason for which we listened to say: “Nobody knows what is the gravity”. This only valid for the quantum mechanics.

========.

Like part of a mathematical speculation on “a straight” space
(euclidiano), based on the Bohr atom, and a series of abuses, others is saying
that, the space is curved (TRG), or that the Bohr atom does not represent the
reality… etc. The quantum mechanics part of a three-dimensional concentric
atom (model of Bohr), understand and it in a straight space (euclidiano).

Already in
the 1915 document (Einstein), it demonstrates it sees and it inescapable, that
it is not possible to be spoken of force to “distance”, admit remote forces is
to admit the magic in the physics.

But these
“Mathematicians” (disguised of physicists), voluntarily ignore the forceful and
inescapable test of the same Einstein. They leave from a straight geometry,
that does not agree with the reality.

By this cause
a commentator says: “Finally, I do not believe that the quantum physics
[quantum mechanics] are fascinating. Rather I believe that it is an abomination
that is seriously harming a generation of students and ballast of a terrible
way the advance of science. It would have immediately to be eliminated of the
training programs for this reason. They do not do it because most of those that
they are giving physical nowadays are mathematicians who do not understand the
physics (some, not even they have the level of a student of average education)
and others without having nor idea occur to the reason an a of what they speak.
” http://comunidad.terra.es/forums/thread/4625991.aspx

For the quantum mechanics,
a particle is precise and it does not have volume.

Anyone can know that it cannot have an precise particle, and the mass cannot be without volume. Without speaking of “spin”, etc.

Anyone can know that it cannot have an precise particle, and the mass cannot be without volume. Without speaking of “spin”, etc.

The calculation of mass and
energy is so exact, as the one of precise particle “and without volume”, then
they appear the “neutrino” (with the same criterion).

As well as it is not possible to make congeniar the “story of the stork”
(birth of babies) with the physiology of the sexual reproduction (it is
impossible). Thus it is, to make congeniar the quantum mechanics, with the
reality.

============.

If nothing of that is real, he is not real either the atomic nucleus, or
the electrons giving returned, or the neutrinos, or the quarks, etc. But the
prejudice does not allow to see the reality, to maintain a story, a fantasy; in
order to maintain an amount of people speaking stupidities. That it does not
have support in the observation, but in mathematical or the fantasy, that
separates from the physical axioms (observation).

Thus, if you want to understand something, it begins to think that the
electron is not a particle (in some point), his indetermination (Schrödinger)
occupies all the three-dimensional space of the apparent atom (wave).

Ex. In a hydrogen atom, the orbital one, is an electronic cloud, but it is not dealt as some want to confuse, with a pile of electrons; the electronic cloud is A SINGLE ELECTRON, and its indetermination is the load that is not in some of those points, but in all those points, inclusively, its

Ex. In a hydrogen atom, the orbital one, is an electronic cloud, but it is not dealt as some want to confuse, with a pile of electrons; the electronic cloud is A SINGLE ELECTRON, and its indetermination is the load that is not in some of those points, but in all those points, inclusively, its

**greater presence**is where the “Bohr atom” puts to a such nucleus, that it is impossible, cannot have a nucleus within an electron, because we see that all the space is the electron occupying; thus it is not possible either those such levels of orbit, in that concentric atom.
An isolated electron has the same size that the orbital one, but
isolated the nontour around anything. Like the one that is in the orbital one.
The prejudice of the Bohr atom, rotates to the electron, but this does not have
another foundation that the prejudice, doing a revolving standing wave, to feed
the prejudice. The idea that the electron turns, comes from the spin, that is
means turn, that nothing has to do with turn but a turn effect (property of all
wave).

**Why?**

Because the atom is not three-dimensional, nor he is concentric. In
physics the plane does not exist, the plane is a mathematical abstraction, when
fodder in plane, fodder in a paper or a table, a body, is no physical plane without
body, since there is no body without time. In physics bodies of four dimensions
only exist. For better explanation: http://teoris-tiempo-espacio.blogspot.com/

Still Wiki with all prejudices recognizes: “The concept of which the
electrons are in satelite orbits around the nucleus has left in favor of the
conception of a deslocalizados or diffuse electron cloud in the space, which
represents better the behavior of electrons described by the quantum mechanics
solely like probability density functions to find an electron in a finite
region of space around the nucleus. ”http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81tomo

“In the model of Schrödinger the conception of electrons like tiny
spheres with load give ins that turn around the nucleus, that is an
extrapolation of the experience at macrocospic level towards the tiny
dimensions of the atom. Instead of this, Schrödinger describes to electrons by
means of a wave function, squared of which it represents the probability of
presence in a delimited region of the space. This zone of probability is known
like orbital. ” http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81tomo

“The wavelength of Broglie of an electron whose kinetic energy is of the
order of the kinetic energy of the electron in the hydrogen atom, is of the
same order of magnitude that the size of the atom.” http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cach… (p 57)

In order to understand, it is necessary to forget the fantasies of the
quantum mechanics. And to begin everything again. Clearly, this is not accepted
by the university professors, whom they would have to study again, and the
majority of them, not even know physical, because “mathematical they are
disguised of physicists”.

**The physics is axiomatic**, the axioms are the observation, and the physics is not the logical reasoning, but the explanation of a phenomenon, that regularly contains a logical reasoning.

If you want to understand the atomic physics, you cannot start off of an
error, although soon it is very logical, and more or less it agrees. Thus it
was the heliocentric, logical theory and agreed, and it could predict
phenomena, etc. But it was a fantasy.

**Standard theory**

The call
“standard theory”, part of a concept pseudo scientist: “That science is
progressive”.

It is a positivismo without
strict sense.

The call “standard theory”, is not a theory, is a potpourri of
noncomplementary, different, opposite and antagonistic theories, part of
concepts of: Inexplicable “fundamental forces”, hypothetical particles or
without mass, incongruous schizophrenics photons, mutants neutrinos,
definitions, using the same word or synonymous, etc. Making two physical ones,
the one of the small and the one of the great thing, because there are two
physical different (what stupidity).

Making of the Metaphysical
physics, “cuasi”, magician and mystic.

This call “standard theory”, nobody knows what is
what the Integra or what no. is based on the concept pseudo scientist of the
“progress of science”, following sumatoria of logical reasonings on erroneous
foundations. Reason for which one takes very well with the “theory of the
quantum mechanics”. And as if outside little the pro-government vandalism, does not admit
that it is thought different, without concerning the reality, the stupidities
and contradictions.

He is
lamentable to the state that has arrived the education from the physics and nor
what to speak of the investigation.

The
incredible thing of the subject, is that it is adduced to the technology, to
mask without scientific sense, of the physics that is taught. It is as if we
said that, the vulcanization process, was consequence of the theoretical
investigation of chemistry, anyone can know that it was a practical
investigation (“alchemist”).

It is hour
that these vain university professors (dishonest), they begin “to desasnar
itself”, and forget his doctorates that use like nobiliary titles, to humiliate
to those who show his errors.

Totally
despicable it is the one who maintain of hostages the students, by means of
their “authority” (authoritarianism), to maintain the prejudices, to weaken the
education, and to form inept for the investigation. Justifying its behavior to
the logic, weakening the same base of the physics, that is to say: The
explanation of the physical phenomena.

Also of
despicable they are those that by comfort, advantage, or simple “I do not put”,
are united with these personages. That although against all principle of the
scientific knowledge, it is transformed into is “mass”, town, or “chusma”.

The indignante is the indifference whereupon the things
are taken, because it gives the same, to teach the error that the truth. That
the important thing is not to know how they are the things, but to enjoy the
economic bonanza (a good pay), at the cost of any lie (since gives the same).
Which is education that we want for our children…? How it is possible that
people who seem intelligent, follow with such reasonings?

When I listen
a physicist to say, that nobody can know what is the gravity, I ask myself: Why
Einstein devils wasted the time thinking? Where it is the happiest idea of his
life?

The answer is clear: “There
are two infinite things”. “The human stupidity and the universe, although
second I am not safe” (Einstein).
Another Blogs:

Spanish:

*Otros Blogs:*Creación de Pares

“Mecánica Cuántica”

La luz y los cuerpos transparentes

Factor de Lorentz Sencillo

Disfrazados de FÍSICOS

Doble Ranura

Modelo Atómico

La Gravedad

Partículas Fundamentales

La Masa

Efecto Túnel

###
Teoría Tiempo-espacio

E=mc

^{2}. Cantidad de movimiento
Alejamiento de las Galaxias

El Espacio

Efecto Sagnac

Oscar Roberto Ernst